Dear editor,
Your article "AsiaTown seeks foreign investors," in the Sept. 26 issue, was well written and made me think about some tough issues. I wanted to share with you my thoughts that fundamentally question Hampton Roads' economic development strategy that highlights the area seeking foreign investors for an "AsiaTown" corridor.
Economic development should take a more holistic approach. Is this the right long-term strategy for HR? What are the impacts near-, mid- and long-term? Perhaps a better strategy would be to seek out American investors from within the U.S. Virginia, after all, is one of the nation's most business-friendly states. I believe a melting pot is a better long-term strategy than using government to create an Asian corridor in HR. This creates new pockets of society rather than assimilating into American society with deep cultural ties.
In Hampton Roads, the Asian population has increased 70 percent since the last census to 5.5 percent of total population. The jobs created would most likely service the foreigners who move here first temporary, then permanently. So beyond the revenue ROI for the city, what are the societal benefits for citizens?
If we learned anything from unbridled growth without profit balanced with other societal equities, there are second- and third-order effects that reveal themselves down the road. To recap, the AsiaTown economic development may increase revenue in the short term, but it impacts the other equities that take time to reveal themselves in our society.
Along a related path, China's workforce is 761 million with unemployment only 4.1 percent. The U.S. has a workforce of 150 million and unemployment of 9.2 percent. The Asian "Made in China" impact on the American economy is profound, undeniable and with no end in sight.
Cheap labor, regulations, etc. destroyed our manufacturing and textile base. The exact tipping point is debatable, but there is no doubt we have tipped.
It is also undeniable that Asian products already dominate our region. They dominate virtually every shopping category in military exchanges' inventory, lower-end products, goods and services in Walmart to small gift shops. Even our very own Luray Caverns in Virginia is now dominated by merchandise made in China.
Today, China (Asia) produces high-tech products by starting small and slowly overtaking jobs, technology and using our own education system as an engine to achieve advanced degrees. We have outsourced civil engineering infrastructure jobs, technology jobs and manufacturing.
So, turning back to attracting foreign Asian investors, is this a short-term fix to generate more revenue for more spending by government? Is this the correct strategy for economic development in HR, Virginia or the nation?
I believe that there are clearly equities that are not being considered in the context of what makes us unique and qualities that make us uniquely Hampton Roads.
To your knowledge, is anyone having these discussions?
Barry C. Ezell, Ph.D.
President, Salem Woods Civic Association
Comments
AsiaTown Project and the EB5 Immigrant Investor Program
October 18, 2011 by beachdev2, 30 weeks 1 day ago
Re. Mr. Ezell's letter 'AsiaTown seeks foreign investors-Is this the right strategy for Economic Development- In Mr. Ezell words, he has ''put a lot of thought" into his letter- however, had he done his homework he would have found none of his points relate to the EB5 program or the AsiaTown project. To put it in perspective, 1) the subject of the article is a private company based in Virginia Beach, not a regional department of Economic Development, 2) the AsiaTown project is a private development on a 10 acre site in the Princess Anne section of Virginia Beach, not an entire swath of the State of Virginia. The map shown in the article is the area of the Regional Center- not the AsiaTown project. ANY development project within the geographical region shown (both blue and green area) is eligible for foreign investment through the Virginia Atlantic Regional Center. 3) the EB5 program is a 'Federal Immigrant Investor program created by Congress in 1992 for qualified foreigners seeking to invest in a business that will benefit the US economy and create at least 10 full- time job for US workers' (USCIS website). Any qualified foreigner is eligible, not just Asian foreigners. Additionally, there is no requirement for the investor to live in the area of the investment project. And finally, the investment monies are used to build the project, not start a foreign business as Mr. Ezell's letter implies. The administrative costs are covered by application fees so this program operates at no cost to the taxpayer. There are currently 178 EB5 Regional Centers operating in 40 States. The State of Virginia is woefully behind in tapping the significant economic development opportunity that the EB5 program presents, but the VARC will soon change that. I encourage Mr. Ezell to google ' EB5 Regional Center' and take a look at the projects other EB5 Regional Centers are completing in their regions.
Kathy Owens
President, Beach Development Group